When push comes to shove, they will run much slower than the faster rated, higher priced models.A general idea of how boost frequencies operate. There is a reason the low-end model of MacBook Pro (or iMac) costs less. So when you are deciding which MacBook Pro to buy, you need to take the above demonstration into consideration. The harder and longer your MacBook Pro works on a demanding task (or multiple demanding tasks), the more likely it is to throttle down to the rated core frequency - or even LOWER if necessary. Intel's Turbo Boost Technology allows the processor cores to run faster than the rated operating frequency - UNLESS they begin to operate ABOVE the power, current, and temperature specification limits.

With Turbo Boost DISabled, the 3.1GHz Core i5 model was 57% faster than the 2.3GHz Core i5. With the Turbo Boost enabled, the 3.1GHz Core i5 model was only 2% faster. We ran the test with and without Turbo Boost enabled.Īs we suspected, disabling Turbo Boost on the low-end 2.3GHz Core i5 MacBook Pro caused a huge drop in performance compared to the other two 13-inch models.

This test makes use of various algorithms to stress all available processor cores (real and virtual). Current CPU core clock frequency can be monitored (and graphed) using Intel Power Gadget.) (* Turbo Boost can be switched off with a utility called Turbo Boost Switcher. The core clock frequency is pegged during the rendering.Ģ017 3.5GHz i7 = 2017 MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch, 3.5GHz Dual-Core i7 processor (Turbo Boost 4.0GHz), Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU, 16G of 2133 MHz LPDDR3 memory, Four TB3 ports, Touch BarĢ017 3.1GHz i5 = 2017 MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch, 3.1GHz Dual-Core i5 processor (Turbo Boost 3.5GHz), Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU, 8G of 2133MHz LPDDR3 memory, Four TB3 ports, Touch BarĢ017 2.3GHz i5 = 2017 MacBook Pro Retina 13-inch, 2.3GHz Dual-Core i5 processor, (Turbo Boost 3.6GHz) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 8G of 2133MHz LPDDR3 memory, Two TB3 ports, NON Touch Bar We chose Cinebench because it forces all available CPU cores to be involved in rendering the 3D model.

To test this hypothesis, we ran the Cinebench MP CPU test with and without Turbo Boost enabled*.

Our hypothesis is that when Turbo Boost is disabled, the performance gap will grow. Posted September 13th, 2017 by rob-ART morgan, mad scientistĪt the end of a recent article, we mentioned that one possible reason for low level MacBook Pro nibbling at the heels of the mid level MacBook Pro was that when both are running in Turbo Boost mode, the CPU core frequency is very similar.

How to enable turbo boost mac os